суббота, 14 апреля 2012 г.

Street children in Russia

Russia is the country which is focused on modernization and innovation in the economic sphere. Russia is a developing country, though it has a problem on the way to realize all the ambitious plans. It is street children.
There is no exact statistics about the homeless children in Russia, so the state departments operate different numbers. There are several reasons for that. Firstly, there is no clear definition for the street children. The statistics mentions different children groups: neglected children, children with no parents, social orphans and so on.  Secondly, it is difficult to estimate the number of the street children as they often hide from people’s eyes. Some official sources say there are 700 thousand of them; others say there are almost a million of the street children in the country. According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs they represent 2,17 % of Russian children, while the total number of children in the country is 28 million. Thus, rate is two street children per every hundred children.
Some characteristics of the Russian street children:
  •  Most of the Russian street children are social orphans. Usually they have parents but choose not to live with them. The reasons for such a decision can be different: the poverty, the family conflicts, physical and psychological punishment, alcohol or drug abuse, etc.
  • Most of the Russian street children decide to leave home because of psychological conflicts they experience there. The research conducted by the Russian Science Academy provides the following information: 68,2 % of the street children have psychological conflicts in the family or in the orphanages. 74,8 % of the street children want to be back to the family or orphanages. 9,2% of the street boys have a desire to serve in the army. 10 % dream to have a normal life, to create their own families and to have a job. There are 29,2 % of boys and 47,7 % of girls among the street children who do not want to be back to their past. 74,7 % of children has the desire to work. Usually, they want to be a driver, a teacher, a doctor, a soldier or a fireman. Most of the children see a good life as a future possibility after they survive during their childhood.
  • · The street children live in groups. The children who are not involved into any group and who live by themselves represent only 15 % of the Russian street children.  


 
It is necessary to mention here that there is a shift in the phenomenon of youth criminalization, which is becoming more organized. Nowadays 70% of homeless youth crimes are committed by groups. This negative trend leads to the increasing of staying in a prison. Also homeless youth involve young people who have families but spend a lot of time outside home. Another negative tendency here is the increasing participation of youth in grownups criminal activity. One third of youth crime is committed by grownups guidance. Also we face the increasing rate of the homeless children from the Former Soviet Union countries. All the negative tendencies exist in the world perspective but it is more “popular” in Russia, a country with a street crime mafia and rich history.
The phenomenon of the street children is connected to the increasing number of parents who are deprived of their parental rights. However, according to the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs the significant part of homeless minors committing crime, comes from successful families without any financial problems. Their parents are not drug or alcohol abusers and they belong to a “normal” family type.
Most of the parents were grown up in the Soviet Union where financial success was a rarity. Now this generation spends much time and energy to give their children all they lacked themselves. However, while they are busy with the financial success they forget about other children needs. The lack of parental love and their participation in children’s life lead to children aggression and the desire to attract the attention by deviant behavior.
The transition to the capitalist system destroyed the old structure of socialization without creating a new one. As a result the number of free preschool institution, schools for children was reduced while the income level of the most families was not.  Now children have a limited access to public sport, music, draw, dance school and other children entertainment activity and recreation center which used to be a significant part in socialization. The secondary education turned to be optional and be the higher education became commercialized. It also effected in a negative way. Earlier it was obligatory to finish high school. Nowadays young people are required to study only nine years.  The last two years at high school are optional. Moreover, if the studying during these nine years was not successful for the child, he cannot continue the education. Meanwhile the institution of higher education requires to complete 11 years of high school. Quite many young people at their age of 15 do not continue their education nor do not work.
They do not need public education, the street gives them necessary for their  “unique” life: need something – take it no matter how. Unfortunately, this kind of education often leads to the sad future. It is a well-known fact that street children are the main reserve for the juvenile correction. According to the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs 60% of Russian street children became the criminal offenders.



There is a plenty of researches about homeless youth conducted by state and independent organizations (like UNISEF) as it is one of the main social problems in the country. Most of the recommendations are created to solve the problems and they can be divided into three groups: 
1.                  The improving interaction between organizations working with youth in the existing government system; the improving the law system and increasing the financial resources; the creating of special government body subordinated by President Administration and responsible for solving this problem.
2.                  The developing preventive methods.
I decided to tell about the Russian street children as it is the perfect way to illustrate how changing of the systems and values leads to the social problems. Russia transferred from socialism to the system of market relations because people were tired to be controlled by the government and they looked for a freedom to control their lives by themselves. Nowadays Russian people have more opportunities and possibilities than before, but they still expected the government to protect them from vulnerable groups of population. However, when people rely on the government, the obligation to concern children issues exists in every country.
It is often said in literature that street children exist in economically poor countries. However, the Russian example shows that it is not the key factor. According to the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation, the government spends averagely 1,7 thousand dollars on one orphanage per month. Most of the Russian children living with their families do not have such financial resources.  Moreover, there are different special programs.  However, it does not help to improve the situation. The critics say that the problem is that children are not involved to anything but study. It makes them to have a consumer attitude toward the government.  
The Russian history analysis shows that the country had a better success to reduce the number of the street children after the Russian Civil War and World War II. The devastated country with poor financial resources used to solve all these problems. The specialists speak about schools and communities with much attention to the labor education. Education and labor became the principals for the process of decriminalization. Thus children had a clear idea in the mind that they have to work hard, to earn their own money to survive and rely on them.
Do you think the government is able to protect the children without participation of the society? What are the concrete steps for the government?

воскресенье, 1 апреля 2012 г.

Better 10 Graves Than One Extra Birth
    One of the Chinese proverbs says: “Better 10 graves than one extra birth” (1). This proverb gives the best description for the one-child policy in China. It is the official birth control policy which has been implemented by the government since 1978. This policy does not allow married couples living in urban areas to have the second child. However, it does not prohibit rural families to give the birth to more than one child. Thus, this policy is mostly implicated in rural areas. Also, there is an exception for ethnic minorities and parents raised without siblings. Sometimes wealthy families can pay a fee to the government if they want to have more than one child. In case the first child is a girl, Chinese families have an opportunity to get the government’s permission to have the second child. Also, it is possible if a child has physical disability, mental illness or mental retardation.  The government does not count a child without the Chinese citizenship as well (2).
    The policy was created as the response to existing economic, social and environmental problems. The management reproduction principles such as “one family – one child” were officially included in the Constitution of China in 1982 (3). Chinese government anticipated these measures would stop population growth which had led to deficit of natural resources, poor social service, law population income, unemployment and others. The company reached the expectations. According to the government officials the policy reduced birth rate and averted around 400 million births since 1979 (2).

   The reduction of birth rates helped to solve the problems connected with the population growth. Thus, the population income has increased since there were fewer children in a family.  The policy implementation raised parents’ ability to collect or invest some money as they didn’t need to spend much money on children’s upbringing. Moreover, Chinese parents were motivated to save money in order to survive when they were old. However, this tendency had some disadvantages. Nowadays, there is a huge risk for the single child not to support financially his parents in the future.
   There are some other negatives trends created by the policy implementation:
·         The problem of an aging society;
·         The decline of young workers;
·         The gender imbalance (more men in Chinese population structure) (4).

   The policy is criticized for its cruel methods to be implemented. It requires Chinese citizens to pay monetary penalty for breaking the law. Also, they can be deprived of work bonuses or even be fired, especially if they are hired in a governmental organization. The Chinese government pays much money for the information about the law breakers to have unplanned pregnancy. Besides financial manipulation, sterilization and forced abortions are widely used. Due to the traditional preference to have a male child, China faces a huge number of aborting female fetus as well as killing female infants.
   There are some evidences for the Chinese government to force women in aborting the fetus even during the last months of pregnancy.  For example, the press conference held by Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission in Washington in 2009 presented 14 crying facts by ‘Women’s Rights without Frontiers’ organization (5). These facts inform about the forced abortion and other cruel methods of the birth control and the family planning in China In some regions it is allowed to use the forced abortion if a woman is not married or does not have permission for the childbirth. Sometimes the force abortion leads to women death (1).

   It’s needless to say that despite of all the existing penalties, families do not obey the policy but create different ways to deceive the government. For example, the pregnant woman can hide her pregnancy until a baby’s born. Another way is to register a child as someone’s who does not have his own. Also, there are some cases when children do not acquire Chinese citizenship to hide them from the government. This practice violates children’s rights to have a citizenship and leads to the negative effects (2).
   I have made up my mind to choose this topic for my blog because it had been sticking to my head for a long time. I do not have an unambiguous view on it about it and the more I think, the more I am confused.
   On the one hand, the overpopulation problem explains the necessity of birth control measures. Unfortunately, or maybe fortunately, our natural resources and territory are limited. Environment makes its own rules for people’s life in each country. Sometimes it gives an opportunity to create strong economy by providing natural resources. Sometimes it forces people to adapt to rigorous climate. However, all cases make people depend on the territory they have. Maybe I need some corrections here. It is not the environment makes the territory rules but people and the government system. As the Earth is divided to different territories, each nation has its own piece of the pie. The size of the “piece” depends on the nation power. It happened so the China the territory which is huge but still is not enough. So, how the government can improve the situation? As it is not possible to broaden the territory and I do not have the alternative answers here, it compels me to accept the idea of the birth control necessity.
   On the other hand, the theoretical idea about the birth control methods and the one-child policy are contradicted with the idea of human rights. Such methods as sterilization and abortion worsen the existing situation as they violate the women’s right to have children and children’s right to be born.
It is interesting that China has to commit the crime against the humanity by sterilizing women and implying force abortion to stop population growth. Meanwhile Russia, its neighbor government, has a demographic crisis and financially encourages citizens to have more children.

   To sum it up I would like you to think over the following questions. Our society turned out to be so complex and systemized by dividing into countries, ethnicities, religions, social classes and so on. The longer the humanity exists the more systems appear, the more rules each system has inside. Originally the systems were created in order to protect the members and make their life safer. So, let me raise the questions here. Does it protect or destroy us? Does it make us strong or weak? Do the boundaries make us feel safe or afraid?
   The policy and situation in China led me to the main question. Is it possible to say to the unborn child - Sorry, but you were conceived in a wrong country, there is no place for you?


Sources:
1.      China: human rights violations and coercion in one-child policy enforcement. (2004, Committee on International Relations House of Representatives). Retrieved March 24, 2012, from GlobalSecurity.org: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/congress/2004_hr/041214-transcript.pdf
2.      The negative trends of “one-child” policy in China.(in Russian)  (2010) Retrieved March 25, 2012, from The Epoch Times: http://www.epochtimes.ru/content/view/37349/4/
3.      China Sticking with One-Child Policy. (March 11, 2008, J. Yardley). Retrieved March 28, 2012, from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/11/world/asia/11china.html?_r=2
4.      China's one-child policy and the population explosion. (January, 12, 2012, Button, Graham). Retrieved March 28, 2012 from FPO: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Indian-Journal-Economics-Business/278509628.html
5.      When a Woman’s body Becomes the Domain of the State, Part II. ( November, 22, 2009, Gary Feurerberg). Retrieved March 29, 2012 from The Epoch Times: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/china-news/when-a-womans-body-becomes-the-domain-of-the-state-part-ii-25490.html